Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Gravity

Spouse and I had looked forward to Gravity for months, and so we saw it last weekend with Nurse Sibling and Nurse Sibling's Spouse. It did not disappoint.

I appreciated a few things in particular about the movie (besides it being gorgeous and entertaining):
  1. The astronaut characters act like professional instead of space cowboys.
  2. Characters spend their time trying to escape the disaster rather than trying to get to the bottom of it (like Cloverfield). 
  3. Sandra Bullock does not appear to be wearing makeup.
  4. As written and portrayed, Sandra Bullock's character could have been played by a male actor, and it would not have seemed odd in the least.
I was trying to articulate point #4 to Spouse on the ride to post-movie beers, and it was easiest to describe what the character was not: a chip-on-her-shoulder Amazon, a sexy love interest, a damsel in distress. She just seemed like a normal person, and at no point did it feel like her femininity was being exploited or artificially emphasized. Alfonso CuarĂ³n has said that he received pressure to cast a man in the lead role, and I'm glad that he didn't listen.

Alien's Ripley was similarly not subject to the usual lady treatment, and perhaps it helped that all of the characters in Dan O'Bannon and Ronald Shusett's original script were "unisex"*. I look forward to the day when more female characters can be summarized as astrophysicists/parents/golfers/bankers rather than tough, smart, sexy astrophysicists/parents/golfers/bankers.




*Really, written as male but open to being played either way.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.